FAT Studio

Back when we worked together as FAT, we always believed that architecture was much more than building. Even that architecture was much more than architecture. Music, books, films and TV were as much part of our own canon as Bernini and Le Corbusier. This seminar series, taught together but apart, was a kind of primer in this way of thinking. Vaguely centered around the idea of architecture and representation, we made drawings about drawings, watched movies with models, drew lines, made music and wrote novels. Might thinking about architecture through these different forms of media and alternative kinds of representation be a way of generating new understandings of how or where architecture is created? Deliberately experimental and open ended, the seminar resurrected two of the core beliefs we always had at FAT: That architecture might not revolve around making buildings or that when you are making buildings the content of the architecture might be something other than architecture.

 

Project:

For a limited season only, FAT was back. Its three protagonists, older if not necessarily wiser, reunited to teach a studio at ABK Stuttgart.

Some of the old hits were there, numbers like: ‘What is the relationship between architecture and representation”; “What is the boundary between architectural representation and the real?”; “When does a drawing or an object become architectural?”. The studio featured 3 kick off exercises, each led by a different FAT faction on boundaries, drawings and plans respectively. These led to a main project: To take on an earlier English postmodernist in Stuttgart. With a brief to extend James Stirling’s Staatsgalerie, students projects reappraised and reconfigured big Jim’s gallery with added mundane programmes housed in variously aggressive, irreverent, sympathetic or surreal new forms. The aim of the studio was aligned with the ancient FAT project of reinvigorating the possibilities of postmodern architecture, extending its reach and range with a treasure trove of stolen architectural languages, alternative tactics and multiple sensibilities.

Drawing by Ivana Arvizu
Drawing by Ivana Arvizu
Drawing by Ivana Arvizu
Drawing by Ivana Arvizu

FAT Studio

In my opinion, this studio was about rethinking architecture in general and questioning the usual methods of designing. We had to use the drawing as a way of thinking and understanding architecture and in this process, the architectural representation became the project itself, I had to become much more aware of what I wanted to show and how I wanted to show it. The designing process consisted on constantly questioning not only how to better illustrate my ideas but how to develop them through the drawing.

Entstanden in

mit Prof.in i.V. Hanna Noller M.A. / Prof. i.V. Sebastian Klawiter M.A. / FAT Studio, AM Natalie Weinmann

FAT-Studio

Lehrstuhl für Entwerfen, Architektur und Design
Chair of Architecture and Design

FatBandBack

 

Prof. Charles Holland

Prof. Sam Jacob

Prof. Sean Griffiths

 

 

http://fat-studio.tumblr.com

 

The Tumblr page is a collection of works done by the students of the FAT STUDIO during the summer semester 2020 at ABK Stuttgart. Please use menu at the bottom to search for a specific project brief or use the tag search field to explore the page by inserting for example: Sebastian Chavez, Claudia Gomez, Gordon Krauß, Fabian Klein, Linh Vu, Yannik Plachtzik, Xinyu Chen, Ivana Arvizu, Lucia Schreiber, Berivan Palantöken, Constanze Becker, Lea Eichelbrönner, Berat Kaymaz

 

Or for seeing the final drawings type in: GreetingsToSterling